Tratamiento percutáneo de oclusiones coronarias crónicas aorto-ostiales: resultados y consideraciones técnicas de un registro multicéntrico / Percutaneous coronary intervention in aorto-ostial coronary chronic total occlusion: outcomes and technical considerations in a multicenter registry

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: La intervención coronaria percutánea (ICP) de oclusiones coronarias totales crónicas (OTC) aorto-ostiales constituye un reto como subgrupo. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar los aspectos técnicos y resultados tras la ICP de OTC aorto-ostiales en un registro multicéntrico. MÉTODOS: Se incluyó a los pacientes de 4 centros con una OTC aorto-ostial tratados con ICP entre febrero de 2013 y diciembre de 2018. Se analizaron las tasas de éxito, los aspectos del procedimiento y los resultados. RESULTADOS: Se incluyó a 103 pacientes. La media de edad fue 64±10 años y la puntuación J-OTC, 3,1±1,1. Había 31 OTC (30,4%) con ausencia total de muñón. El éxito técnico y del procedimiento se obtuvo en 79 (76,7%) y 78 (75,7%) de los pacientes respectivamente. El abordaje retrógrado fue la técnica de cruce exitosa más frecuente (n=49; 62,0%), especialmente en OTC sin muñón (el 82,6 frente al 53,5%; p = 0,02). La ausencia de colaterales intervencionistas fue la única variable asociada con fallo técnico (OR=12,38; IC95%, 4,02-38,15; p <0,001). En 4 pacientes (3,9%) se produjeron perforaciones coronarias, todas tratadas exitosamente con stent cubierto (sin tamponamiento) y 2 pacientes (1,9%) sufrieron un accidente cerebrovascular (1 fue transitorio). Tras una mediana de seguimiento de 31 meses, 3 pacientes (2,9%) murieron por causa cardiovascular y 13 (12,6%) requirieron nueva revascularización del vaso diana. CONCLUSIONES: Las OTC aorto-ostiales representan un subgrupo técnicamente complejo. Sin embargo, operadores expertos pueden obtener una tasa de éxito aceptable con resultados favorables al seguimiento. La presencia de colaterales intervencionistas, que permiten el acceso retrógrado, parece ser clave para que el procedimiento sea exitoso

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for aorto-ostial chronic total coronary occlusion (CTO) can be a particularly challenging lesion subset. The aim of this study was to analyze the technical aspects and outcomes of aorto-ostial CTO PCI in a multicenter registry. METHODS: Patients undergoing aorto-ostial CTO PCI at 4 centers between February 2013 and December 2018 were included. Success rates, as well as procedural aspects and outcomes, were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included. Mean age was 64±10 years and the mean J-CTO score was 3.1±1.1. Thirty-one lesions (30.4%) were flush ostial CTOs. Technical and procedural success were achieved in 79 (76.7%) and 78 (75.7%) of the patients, respectively. The retrograde approach was the most frequent successful crossing technique (n=49; 62.0%), especially in flush vs nonflush aorto-ostial CTOs (82.6% vs 53.5%; P=.02). The only variable independently associated with technical failure was the absence of interventional collaterals (OR, 12.38; 95%CI, 4.02-38.15; P <.001). Coronary perforation occurred in 4 patients (3.9%) requiring covered stent implantation (without subsequent cardiac tamponade) and 2 patients (1.9%) had a stroke (one of which was a transient ischemic attack). During a median follow-up of 31 months, 3 (2.9%) patients died from cardiovascular causes and 13 (12.6%) required repeat target vessel revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Aorto-ostial occlusions represent a challenging subset for PCI. However, an acceptable success rate with favorable outcomes during follow-up can be achieved by experienced operators. The presence of interventional collaterals allowing the use of the retrograde approach is key for achieving procedural success

Percutaneous coronary intervention in aorto-ostial coronary chronic total occlusion: outcomes and technical considerations in a multicenter registry.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for aorto-ostial chronic total coronary occlusion (CTO) can be a particularly challenging lesion subset. The aim of this study was to analyze the technical aspects and outcomes of aorto-ostial CTO PCI in a multicenter registry. METHODS: Patients undergoing aorto-ostial CTO PCI at 4 centers between February 2013 and December 2018 were included. Success rates, as well as procedural aspects and outcomes, were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included. Mean age was 64±10 years and the mean J-CTO score was 3.1±1.1. Thirty-one lesions (30.4%) were flush ostial CTOs. Technical and procedural success were achieved in 79 (76.7%) and 78 (75.7%) of the patients, respectively. The retrograde approach was the most frequent successful crossing technique (n=49; 62.0%), especially in flush vs nonflush aorto-ostial CTOs (82.6% vs 53.5%; P=.02). The only variable independently associated with technical failure was the absence of interventional collaterals (OR, 12.38; 95%CI, 4.02-38.15; P <.001). Coronary perforation occurred in 4 patients (3.9%) requiring covered stent implantation (without subsequent cardiac tamponade) and 2 patients (1.9%) had a stroke (one of which was a transient ischemic attack). During a median follow-up of 31 months, 3 (2.9%) patients died from cardiovascular causes and 13 (12.6%) required repeat target vessel revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Aorto-ostial occlusions represent a challenging subset for PCI. However, an acceptable success rate with favorable outcomes during follow-up can be achieved by experienced operators. The presence of interventional collaterals allowing the use of the retrograde approach is key for achieving procedural success.

Percutaneous reintervention on aortic coarctation stenting.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous reintervention in patients who underwent aortic coarctation stenting at an early age. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 1993 to 2018, 177 patients with aortic coarctation were treated with stent implantation at our centre; 33 of them were treated at less than 12 years of age and required reintervention because of their rate of growth. The average age of the patients at the first and second procedure was 6±3 years and 19±7 years, respectively. At the reintervention procedure, 15 (45%) patients were treated with balloon re-expansion, and 18 (55%) were treated with re-stenting. Success was obtained in 30 patients (91%). The gradient across the coarctation changed from 22±10 mmHg to 6±6 mmHg, while the minimal lumen diameter increased from 9±6 mm to 15±3 mm. There were eight occlusions of the femoral artery (after the first procedure), and two covered stents were needed because of femoral bleeding. The mean follow-up time after the second procedure was 5±4 years. A third procedure was required only in three patients (9%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with aortic coarctation treated with stent placement at an early age can be successfully re-treated after the completion of their somatic growth.

Conventional vascular access site approach versus fully trans-wrist approach for chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: a multicenter registry.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of vascular complication and major bleeding in patients undergoing chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a fully trans-wrist access (TWA) approach versus a conventional approach based on trans-femoral access (TFA). BACKGROUND: TFA is the preferred vascular access in CTO PCI, but it has been associated with a non-negligible risk of complications. METHODS: This retrospective registry included all patients undergoing CTO PCI at five institutions between July 2011 and October 2018. Patients were divided into two groups: Conventional (patients treated with at least one TFA) and Fully TWA (subjects exclusively treated with one or two TWA). The primary safety endpoint was a composite of vascular complications and major bleeding. The primary efficacy endpoint was procedural success. RESULTS: We included 1,900 patients (Conventional n = 1,496 and Fully TWA n = 404). Conventional patients showed higher occlusion complexity (J-CTO score 2.1 ± 1.2 vs. 1.5 ± 1.1, p < .001). Procedural success showed no significant difference between both groups (85.7 vs. 83.0%, p = .17). The primary safety endpoint occurred more frequently in the Conventional group (10.3 vs. 4.5%, p < .001), driven by vascular complications (9.4 vs. 3.7%, p < .001). On multivariate analysis, not using a Fully TWA approach was an independent predictor of the study endpoint, after adjusting for age, sex, diabetes, body mass index, chronic kidney disease, prior coronary artery bypass graft, and J-CTO score. CONCLUSIONS: Embracing a Fully TWA approach for CTO PCI might be associated with lower incidence of a composite endpoint of vascular complications and major bleeding, compared with a Conventional approach.

Impact of the repositionable Evolut R CoreValve system on the need for a permanent pacemaker after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) with the CoreValve and Evolut R prostheses, to evaluate the implantation depth with both types of prostheses, and to study factors predicting the need for PPI. BACKGROUND: The Evolut R CoreValve can be recaptured and repositioned during deployment, allowing a more precise implantation. METHODS: A total of 208 patients treated with CoreValve and 137 patients treated with Evolut R were analyzed. The depth of the prosthesis in the LVOT was measured by angiography in the annular perpendicular view projection after deploymen in all patients. RESULTS: Baseline conduction abnormalities were comparable between the groups (85/208, 40.9% vs. 53/137, 38.7%; p = 0.69). The mean prosthesis depth was 10.3 ± 8.6 mm in the CoreValve group and 5.5 ± 2.7 mm in the Evolut R group; p < 0.0001. Conduction disturbances after valve implantation were more frequent with the CoreValve (new-onset left bundle branch block: 93, 44.7% vs. 16, 11.7%; p < 0.05, first-degree atrioventricular block: 23, 11.1% vs. 5, 3.6%; p < 0.05). In addition, the incidence of PPI was significantly lower with Evolut R (45, 21.6% vs. 15, 10.9%; p = 0.01). The predictors of the need for PPI were the mean depth of the prosthesis (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06-1.21; p < 0.0001) and prior right bundle branch block (OR 10.22, 95% CI: 4.62-22.63; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The recapturable capability of the Evolut R system allowed for higher and precise valve implantation. This fact had an impact on the reduction in the need for PPI.

Coronary artery perforation during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: epidemiology, mechanisms, management, and outcomes.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology, mechanisms, management, and outcomes of coronary artery perforation during chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 1,811 consecutive patients undergoing CTO PCI at five centres between 2011 and 2018. Coronary perforation was observed in n=99 (5.5%). Patients with perforation were older, had a higher J-CTO score, more often required antegrade dissection/re-entry and the retrograde approach, and had lower success rates. The frequency of Ellis type I, II, III and III "cavity spilling" perforations was 11%, 46%, 28%, and 14%, respectively. In 48% of cases, perforation involved the CTO vessel, while the retrograde approach was responsible for 46% of cases. In 53% of cases perforations required intervention. The most frequently applied management strategies included clinical observation (47%), covered stent implantation (25%), balloon occlusion (9%), and coil/fat embolisation (9%). Tamponade was observed in 20/99 (20%) perforation cases. Ellis type III perforations were most frequently observed at the CTO site. These were accountable for 16/20 tamponades and 3/5 deaths. In-hospital mortality was 5.1% vs 0.3% in patients with versus those without perforation (p<0.001). Older age, occlusion length >20 mm, rotational atherectomy, antegrade dissection/re-entry, and the retrograde approach were independently associated with coronary perforation. Patients with perforation suffered an increased incidence of target vessel failure on short-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary perforation is observed in a non-negligible proportion of CTO PCIs, often requires intervention, and is associated with tamponade and mortality in a minority of patients. CTO vessel-related perforations are associated with the highest burden of morbidity and mortality.